New weapon in terror fight touted |

New weapon in terror fight touted

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge on Thursday praised Congress for funding a new program designed to keep tabs on foreign visitors.

Ridge, who was in Westmoreland County yesterday to hand out a grant of nearly $6 million to purchase radios for first responders to access a new emergency dispatch system, touted the U.S. VISIT Program as the next phase in the fight against terrorism.

“It’s another level of protection as we consolidate watch lists. We get a lot of information about terrorists every day, finding out about who they are and how they operate. We go into these places, and they leave certain pieces of evidence, like fingerprints,” Ridge said.

The program requires that foreign visitors be fingerprinted and photographed at major entry points in the United States, such as international airports, including Pittsburgh. Those security measures also would be in place at seaports and other land entry points into the country.

Visitors would again be fingerprinted upon leaving the country. The two sets of prints would be compared to ensure there is a match and that the same person who entered the country is leaving.

On Wednesday, Congress passed a $29.4 billion spending bill for homeland security that provided about $330 million to fund the program in 2004, one of the first major initiatives of Ridge’s cabinet-level department.

Ridge said the program won’t be intrusive, and travelers won’t be dramatically affected by the increased security measures at airports. The benefits, though, will enable authorities to keep better records and better tabs on visitors, he said.

“If you are one of those people who are visiting us, we’ll know who you are and that you’ve entered. And then we’ll have a system to match your fingerprints and see if you’ve left after your visa has expired. If you haven’t gone and we know you’re around, we’ll come and look for you,” Ridge said.

Ridge yesterday also downplayed reports released by Congress’ General Accounting Office that criticized federal security screeners at airports and safety assessments at nuclear power plants.

Ridge said the GAO is typically critical, and that internal controls at airports and power plants indicated that security is tighter than it’s ever been.

Since federal screeners took over at airports, millions of weapons have been confiscated and air travel has never been safer, while U.S. inspections of power plants revealed they are strong enough to withstand an airplane crash, he said.

“The GAO wants us to be perfect. That is our goal. We’re good and we’re getting better, but I’m not sure we’ll ever be perfect,” Ridge said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.