Newsmaker: Judge Joy Flowers Conti |

Newsmaker: Judge Joy Flowers Conti

Judge Joy Flowers Conti

Age: 61

Residence: Pine

Family: husband, Anthony Conti; three sons

Background: Conti was born in McKean County and grew up on Army bases around the world, graduating from high school in Germany. She earned a bachelor’s degree and a law degree from Duquesne University. Conti was the editor in chief of the Duquesne Law Review and graduated summa cum laude from the law school. Before she was appointed as a federal judge in 2002, she was a law clerk for a state Supreme Court justice, a tenured professor of the Duquesne Law School and a private attorney who focused on bankruptcy, health care and corporate law.

Noteworthy: U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts appointed Conti as chair of the Judicial Conference Committee on the Administration of the Bankruptcy System. The Judicial Conference oversees the administration of the federal court system, and the bankruptcy committee specifically oversees the bankruptcy courts. Conti said the challenge facing the committee is a proposal to add 13 bankruptcy judge positions and convert 22 temporary bankruptcy judgeships to permanent positions. The economic recession has increased the caseload on the bankruptcy courts, and more than half of the current bankruptcy judges will become eligible to retire in the next five years, she said. The bankruptcy courts play a vital role in helping people and companies in some of their worst moments, Conti said.

Quote: “It is really important to our local economy, so it’s very interesting work.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.