NEWSMAKER: Marcel Just |

NEWSMAKER: Marcel Just

Newsmaker: Carnegie Mellon professor Marcel Just, director of the school's Scientific Imaging and Brain Research Center, was selected to receive the Society for Text and Discourse Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award for his brain and language research.

Marcel Just

Noteworthy: The Carnegie Mellon University professor has been selected to receive the Society for Text and Discourse Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award. It is given to scholars who make significant strides in how people comprehend language and text.

Residence: Squirrel Hill. Originally from Montreal, Canada.

Age: 64.

Family: Partner, Barbara, and two sons, ages 29 and 34.

Education: Just did his undergraduate work at McGill University in Montreal and earned his Ph.D. at Stanford.

Background: Just has spent his career at CMU since coming to the university as an assistant professor at age 24. His research has centered on how what the eye sees leads to what the brain understands. He founded and is director of CMU's Scientific Imaging and Brain Research Center. He and his colleagues have developed a theory of autism called unconnectivity theory, which suggests the cause is poor communication between the front and rear of the brain. In addition, he and a colleague used machine-learning techniques and brain-imagining data to identify the contents of thoughts, allowing the researchers to technically read the minds of people in a brain scanner.

Quote: β€œIn 1994, I had the opportunity to run my first MRI. All these years, I'd be speculating, developing theories about what was going on inside the mind. For the first time, we could see the activity in the brain, and I've never looked back.”

β€” by Megan Guza

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.