ShareThis Page
Newsmaker: Natalie Arutynov |

Newsmaker: Natalie Arutynov

| Saturday, August 15, 2009 12:00 p.m

Age: 22

Family: Mother, Marina; father, Sergei; brother, Alex, 21

Residence: Oakland, formerly of Upper Holland

Occupation: Undergraduate student at the University of Pittsburgh

Education: She has finished her bachelor’s degree of arts and sciences in economics and political science, and received a certificate in Russian and Eastern European studies. She plans to graduate in August with honors and hopes to attend graduate school to pursue a career in foreign diplomacy.

Background: She received a Fulbright-Hays scholarship and Slavic Workshop scholarship to spend 12 weeks studying Russian during her sophomore year. After six weeks of classes in Pittsburgh, she spent six weeks in Moscow researching the relationship between Russia and the European Union.

Noteworthy: Natalie was selected in May as a National Security Program David L. Boren Scholar, and beginning next month will spend a year living and studying in the Republic of Georgia. The program sponsors students to study languages that are critical to national security, such as Arabic and Russian. Natalie is fluent in Russian, a prerequisite for the program. After her year of study, she will work for the Department of Defense or an intelligence agency for one year before continuing her education.

Quote: “I heard it is a beautiful country with very warm people. I’m excited to see what it will be like, not just to visit for a week or so, but to actually live there for nine months.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.