Archive

Newsmaker: Richard E. Gray | TribLIVE.com
News

Newsmaker: Richard E. Gray

Age: 75

Residence: Salem

Family: Wife, Audrey, four children and four grandchildren

Background: A North Braddock native, Gray graduated from the Carnegie Institute of Technology — now Carnegie Mellon University — in 1956 and embarked on a career in the relatively new field of geotechnical engineering. He helped design several major projects including the Burns Harbor Steel Mill on Lake Michigan, the Lewiston-Queenston Bridge across the Niagara River and the expansion of the Weirton Steel Mill in West Virginia. More recently, he’s worked on several mine-subsidence-prevention projects, and co-founded DiGioia, Gray and Associates LLC five years ago to specialize in utility line foundation work. Gray has led three major U.S. engineering geology groups: the Geological Society of America’s Engineering Geology Division, the Association of Engineering Geologists and the U.S. Committee on the International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment.

Noteworthy: Carnegie Mellon University presented Gray with an Alumni Achievement Award during homecoming weekend, Nov. 4-6. He was recognized for his lifetime of work and for becoming an internationally recognized expert in geotechnical engineering, engineering geology and subsidence engineering.

Quote: “I really enjoy the technical challenges of the work. I wouldn’t get up and come in if it was a budget meeting.”


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.