Archive

Newspaper shooting suspect’s grievances began with classmate | TribLIVE.com
News

Newspaper shooting suspect’s grievances began with classmate

The Associated Press
gtrgazettegallery14070118
A police officer pulls crime scene tape into place near a residence connected to a suspect who opened fire on a newspaper office in Maryland's capital, Thursday, June 28, 2018, in Laurel, Md.
gtrgazettegallery13070118
Police block off the area around the home of a suspect who opened fire on a newspaper office in Maryland's capital earlier, in Laurel, Md., Thursday, June 28, 2018.
ShootingsNewspaper72281jpg5d1f8
In this June 28, 2018, photo released by the Anne Arundel Police, Jarrod Warren Ramos poses for a photo, in Annapolis, Md. First-degree murder charges were filed Friday against Ramos who police said targeted Maryland's Capital Gazette newspaper, shooting his way into the newsroom and killing four journalists and a staffer before officers swiftly arrested him.
gtrgazettegallery26070118
In this June 28 2018 photo released by the Anne Arundel Police, Jarrod Warren Ramos poses for a photo, in Annapolis, Md. First-degree murder charges were filed Friday against Ramos who police said targeted Maryland's capital newspaper, shooting his way into the newsroom and killing four journalists and a staffer before officers swiftly arrested him. (Anne Arundel Police via AP)

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Before he developed a long-running grudge against The Capital Gazette, the man who police say opened fire and killed five newspaper staffers directed his anger at a female high school classmate he barely knew.

Courthouses in Maryland are clogged with lawsuits brought by Jarrod Ramos against judges, reporters and lawyers he thought had wronged him. In each case, they took the side of the classmate who said Ramos had harassed her relentlessly for a year.

Ramos, 38, of Laurel, Md., has been charged with five counts of murder in Thursday’s shooting — one of the deadliest attacks on journalists in U.S. history.

Court documents and social media posts written by Ramos paint a portrait of an angry, frustrated man fuming about how he’d been mistreated and maligned.

His aunt, Vielka Ramos, said her nephew was highly intelligent, but was a solitary man.

“He would try to communicate with people, but he was a loner,” she told The Baltimore Sun.

“He was distant from the family. He just wasn’t close to anybody,” she said.

After his grandmother died several years ago, Ramos stopped attending family gatherings, she said.

Ramos grew up in Severn, about 20 miles (32 kilometers) from Annapolis, and attended Arundel High School, graduating in 1997. In his high school yearbook photo, he is smiling, and has shoulder-length, curly brown hair and oversized glasses.

In late 2009 or early 2010, Ramos contacted a former high school classmate via email thanking her “for being the only person that was ever nice, or said hello to him in high school,” the woman wrote in court documents when she sought a peace order protecting her from Ramos in January 2011.

“I responded saying that I did not remember him,” she wrote.

She said Ramos told her about mental health issues he’d been having, so she suggested a clinic. Ramos then sent her a series of hateful and vulgar emails, including calling her a “dirty slut,” she wrote.

She went to police, and Ramos ended up pleading guilty to a misdemeanor harassment charge. Five days after his guilty plea, the newspaper wrote a story about the case. That touched off a yearslong tirade against the newspaper.

Ramos filed a defamation lawsuit, but a judge dismissed the case, finding that Ramos could not point to a single statement in the article that was false. But Ramos, acting as his own attorney, pursued the case all the way up to Maryland’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, which denied his petition in 2016.

In his written court filings, Ramos frequently used overwrought language. In 2012, when the newspaper argued to have the case tossed out, Ramos referred to his complaint as “a blob of facts — fed and grown on their own sins — and they have stepped right in it, to be eaten alive.”

In one court document, Ramos refers to himself as a citizen who “values truth, integrity, equal justice under the law and fair access to the courts.”

Ramos was employed by an IT contractor for the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics — the agency that does the monthly jobs report and other economic data — from 2007 through 2014, a department spokesman said.

Little else is known about his work history. A lawyer who represented him in the harassment case told the newspaper he holds a degree in computer engineering.

Brennan McCarthy, the lawyer who represented his former classmate, said Ramos’ harassment of her was malicious.

“He was as angry an individual as I have ever seen,” McCarthy said.

After his lawsuit against the newspaper was dismissed, Ramos posted profanity-laced tweets about the paper, its reporters and editors.

In 2015, he tweeted that he would like to see the paper stop publishing, but “it would be nicer” to see two of its journalists “cease breathing.”

Ramos’ online grudge seemed to disappear for a while until some new posts appeared just before the killings.

One of the biggest unanswered questions is what set Ramos off after a two-year period of silence. Investigators were reviewing his social media postings and searching his apartment.

A transcript from a hearing in his defamation case showed that Ramos was particularly bothered that the newspaper article reported he said “f— you, leave me alone” to the woman who accused him of harassment. The woman said she hadn’t written him in months.

“That carries a clear implication that something is wrong inside my head, that I’m insane,” Ramos told the judge.

Ramos sent that same message on the day of the shootings on a Twitter feed he controlled.

“F— you, leave me alone,” he wrote.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.