ShareThis Page
No contest: Monessen rips Greater Works Academy |

No contest: Monessen rips Greater Works Academy

| Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:00 a.m

MONESSEN – The Monessen Lady Greyhounds opened the game with a 20-0 run and never looked back against the Greater Works Academy as they rolled to an easy 64-13 win.

“It is always good to get your first section win out of the way,” said Lady Hounds coach, Major Corley. “We got off to a fast start, and that is exactly how we like to play.”

The Lady Hounds (4-0, 1-0) led 20-1 after one quarter.

“The early lead allowed us to put in our reserves so they could get some good playing time,” said Corley. “The more our reserves play, the better our depth will be come playoff time.”

The Lady Hounds outscored Greater Works (1-3, 0-1) 14-2 to take a 34-3 halftime lead.

“Our subs might have played more than the starters,” said Corley. “That will help us down the road.”

Cassandra Tyree scored five of her game-high 15 points in the third quarter as the Lady Hounds extended their lead to 54-13 heading into the fourth quarter. Tyree also added 10 rebounds for the winners.

“Cassandra played a good all-around game,” said Corley. “She likes getting physical inside.”

The Lady Hounds shut out Greater Works 10-0 in the fourth quarter.

Charel Allen (14) and Nychole Whitlock (12) also hit double figures for the winners. Alicia Stein added seven points for the winners off of the bench.

“Charel passed more to get her teammates into the game,” said Corley. Nycole gets the tempo going for us, and Alicia gave us seven points off of the bench. That is important.”

Allen also added eight rebounds, six assists and six steals for the Lady Hounds. Whitlock had seven steals and five assists for the win-ners.

Amber Rogers led Greater Works with six points.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.