ShareThis Page
No drugs found in surprise locker search |

No drugs found in surprise locker search

Treshea N. Wade
| Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:00 a.m

Police came up empty-handed Monday after a surprise locker search for illegal drugs at Carlynton Junior-Senior High School.

Two drug-sniffing dogs traveled the hallways with police starting at 8:45 a.m. in what was believed to be the school district’s first drug sweep. The dogs, led by officers from the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Department and Robinson and Crafton police, identified 29 lockers as suspicious.

Students and staff stayed in classrooms during the 2 1 / 2 -hour search. Students whose belongings were in the lockers the dogs identified were brought to their lockers and a search was conducted.

District spokeswoman Michale Herrmann said police assured school officials that the dogs are trained to detect even the smallest scent of an illegal drug. While no drugs were found in the lockers, she said at one point in the past the locker or its contents were exposed to some type of drug.

School board President John Meighan said the drug sweep is a sign that the district will do everything possible to provide a safe school environment.

“We were certain the police and dogs were capable of finding any illegal drugs, and the fact that they didn’t find any was a demonstration that we are providing a safe and secure, drug-free environment,” Meighan said, adding the drug searches will continue on an “irregular, unannounced basis.”

School officials said recent talk of student drug use, and drug-related deaths in the Carnegie area last summer, prompted the search.

During the winter break, permanent locks were installed on 1,000 lockers in the building, and a letter outlining the district’s new locker and search policy was mailed to students’ homes.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.