Archive

ShareThis Page
No-gifts rule needs teeth | TribLIVE.com
News

No-gifts rule needs teeth

Even a great law, if not prosecuted, becomes bad government.

Gov.-elect Tom Wolf’s first policy act was to ban gifts for his transition team. He is proposing similar bans as well. Kudos to Mr. Wolf. This move is a good start and shows his prioritization is right on the mark.

I recommend his team consider adding two provisions to these actions:

• Insert a verification mechanism into the ban: It could be something like, “In addition to annual signed affidavits by all employees, the Budget Office will randomly audit three offices and its employees every year to make sure the ban is absolute.”

• Add a severe penalty: “Any employee caught accepting a gift of any value or quantity will be subject to a fine up to $50,000 and forfeiture of that person’s state pension.” That additional language will strike the tone needed to really change government in Pennsylvania.

History has shown that just passing laws is not enough. Laws need teeth and prosecution.

Our state leadership — the House, Senate and governor — needs to start enacting and enforcing these laws and following the nation’s oldest Constitution. With new leaders, some with strong constitutional passions, there is hope.

Kelly Lewis

Mechanicsburg

The writer is the founder of PA SAVE$, a group focused on cost savings for Pennsylvania governments, companies and nonprofits.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.