ShareThis Page
No more excuses — fix the slots law |

No more excuses — fix the slots law

| Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:00 a.m

Our state legislators are paid to make laws, but what they’re really good at is making excuses.

As a result, the provision to bar lawmakers from owning part of a gambling-related business has still not passed the House of Representatives — and it may not any time soon.

The problem began three months ago when a law was passed legalizing slot machines in Pennsylvania. The legislation permitted public officials to own up to 1 percent of a financial stake in a gambling company.

Both parties quickly backtracked when that provision came to light, and quick action was promised to correct it. On Oct. 7, The Senate passed a bill overturning the provision, along with expanding the attorney general’s enforcement powers over a newly formed gambling commission and taking away the commission’s powers to override local zoning ordinances.

But the bill remains stalled in the House, where Republican leaders say they are working on “technical corrections.”

This seems like a great issue for Democrats to seize on heading into an election, but House Minority Leader H. William DeWeese said last week that action on the measure “could wait until hell froze over.” His party supports the ownership ban, but views the other provisions as an attempt to delay the overall package.

With both parties dragging their feet — and an election coming in two weeks — don’t expect action anytime soon. The deadline to pass an amended bill is Nov. 30. The public needs to keep political pressure on to make sure it gets done.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.