ShareThis Page
No speed cameras |

No speed cameras

Letter To The Editor
| Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:00 p.m

Every year, PennDOT declares a Work Zone Safety Week to encourage drivers to slow down and drive cautiously in areas where workers are performing their jobs. What PennDOT does not tell us is that there is no epidemic of speeding or reckless driving in work zones.

Fifteen percent of highway work zone deaths are caused by cars. While this is not good, it’s hardly a reason to double fines and no reason at all to add speed cameras for enforcement.

The problems that lead to car-caused worker deaths are related to bad work-zone engineering and can be fixed, for free, to further reduce fatalities.

Yet, some of our brilliant legislators want to place speed cameras in highway construction work zones so they can unfairly tax reasonable and prudent drivers by mail. Forget the fact that speed cameras only create revenue and not safety. They want to guarantee a steady stream of money flowing into Harrisburg’s bottomless coffers. “Safety” is our public servants’ mantra; harvesting our money is their goal.

The camera makers also must make money or it will kill the politicians’ golden goose.

The average driver and even the average highway worker are not important to our senators, representatives or PennDOT. Causing fear in order to enact laws benefiting special interests is their main concern.

Tom McCarey

Berwyn, Chester County

The writer is an activist with the National Motorists Association.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.