Archive

ShareThis Page
North Huntingdon planners postpone Verizon decision | TribLIVE.com
News

North Huntingdon planners postpone Verizon decision

A final recommendation on a site plan for a proposed Verizon retail store in North Huntingdon has been pushed back for another month.

North Huntingdon planning commissioners voted Monday night to grant a 30-day extension to WD North Huntingdon Investors, which is planning a 4,800-square-foot Verizon store in a development along Route 30 between Barnes Lake Road and Norwin Avenue.

WD is planning an attached 2,400-square-foot retail business, but hasn’t finalized a tenant.

The plan will be up for review again at the board’s Dec. 6 meeting.

The board and a representative for the developer, Michael Chuparkoff, have been whittling down several issues relating to the site plan over the course of three hearings.

The township once made 52 comments on the site plan, but that number has fallen to about 10 conditions officials want WD to address.

Among the continuing issues last night were board members’ concerns about the size of the development on a lot of about 1.8 acres.

“I think it boils down to the building’s too large for the site,” board member Virginia Stump said.

Board members have pushed for a loading dock for the building in case another tenant later replaces Verizon and would need one.

The developer and the township have clashed on other portions of the development, including the township’s past denial of site plans for other businesses and the delayed issuance of an occupancy permit last year for the Walgreens near the Norwin Hills Shopping Center.

Township Planning and Zoning Director Andrew Blenko said township officials are preparing a draft of gas well drilling regulations. A draft might be reviewed by the board as soon as December.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.