ShareThis Page
North Side library relocation plan given green light |

North Side library relocation plan given green light

| Friday, December 28, 2007 12:00 p.m
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
The clock tower of the old Allegheny City branch of the Carnegie Library on Pittsburgh's North Side, Wednesday, March 11, 2015.

Pittsburgh City Council cleared the way Thursday for a new Carnegie Library in the North Side to replace one shuttered after a lightning strike.

Council members voted to transfer a parcel of vacant land on Federal Street to the Urban Redevelopment Authority, which has agreed to sell the land to the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh for $1. The branch will be built near the planned Federal North housing development.

The Federal Street library will replace the historic Allegheny Regional Library at 5 Allegheny Square, which closed in April 2006 after lighting struck the library’s clock tower and did $2 million worth of damage. Insurance covered most of the costs and the library has been repaired, but Carnegie Library officials want to build new.

Allegheny Regional Library was the first opened by steel magnate Andrew Carnegie in what was then the city of Allegheny. President Benjamin Harrison dedicated the library in February 1890.

Some opponents of the move told council members they should not allow the land transfer because of the shuttered branch’s historic significance.

“I urge you … have library service restored to the Allegheny Regional Library and avoid another long-time vacancy in the core of Allegheny Center,” Mt. Lebanon resident Glenn A. Walsh told council members.

“We can’t make the Carnegie Library stay in a location that they don’t want to stay in,” said Councilwoman Tonya Payne, who represents that part of the North Side.

The land transfer passed 7-1. Councilwoman Darlene Harris was the lone dissenter, saying she opposes the library’s move.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.