ShareThis Page
North Union mom gets up to 15 years in killing |

North Union mom gets up to 15 years in killing

Liz Zemba
| Thursday, October 14, 2010 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County woman who pleaded guilty to third-degree homicide for the death of her newborn infant was sentenced to 7 1/2 to 15 years in state prison on Wednesday, despite a tearful plea for mercy.

Sobbing, Sara Sue Hawk, 26, of North Union, stood before Judge Steve Leskinen yesterday and apologized for the death 10 years ago of her newborn daughter.

“I just ask for mercy,” said Hawk. “I just want to be a mother to my (other) children.”

Hawk pleaded guilty in October in the death of the infant who came to be known as “Baby Mary.” Two fishermen discovered the infant’s remains on June 4, 2000, in Cove Run Creek in North Union.

The case went cold until 2008, when state police used DNA to identify Hawk as the mother. Hawk told police her former brother-in-law, Warren Bircher of Adah, helped deliver the baby and placed her in the creek. Bircher was acquitted at a jury trial.

Hawk, who was 16 when she delivered Baby Mary, apologized yesterday.

“There has never been a day, there will never be a day, that goes by that I won’t have to live with this, that I don’t think about that baby,” said Hawk, crying. “I wish every day that I could go back and make smarter decisions, smarter choices.”

Hawk’s attorney, Thomas Shaffer of Uniontown, asked for house arrest instead of a prison sentence. He said Hawk has no other criminal record, and is the mother to a 6-year-old and a 3-month-old infant.

Shaffer said Hawk was “under great, great pressure” in 2000, when she feared her family would not accept the baby she was carrying then. Although Hawk initially gave police conflicting accounts about the infant’s death, she ultimately cooperated with police, even testifying against Bircher, Shaffer said.

At trial, Hawk testified Bircher feared the child was either his or was biracial.

She testified he took the infant from her immediately after birth, wrapped her in a backpack and placed her in the creek.

District Attorney Jack Heneks, who opposed house arrest, said Hawk remains culpable for her actions in 2000.

“She did acknowledge that all of the efforts of her and Mr. Bircher were to the effect they were going to not have that child live,” Heneks said.

Leskinen noted that Hawk kept silent for eight years.

She did not acknowledge responsibility until police identified her as the mother, the judge said, “more or less cornering her.”

As she was placed into handcuffs to be led to jail, Hawk tearfully asked Leskinen for a few moments with her family. A contingent of family members, including Hawk’s infant, accompanied her to the sentencing.

Leskinen denied the request.

“I sympathize,” Leskinen said as Hawk was led, handcuffed and sobbing, out of the courtroom. “But justice is justice at this point.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.