ShareThis Page
North Union Township pastor agrees to move son’s grave |

North Union Township pastor agrees to move son’s grave

A Fayette County pastor who was denied a zoning variance for the burial of his son has agreed to move the grave from church grounds.

Under a settlement agreement, county officials agreed to withdraw code enforcement actions and financial penalties against Liberty Baptist Church, which will bury pastor Ewing Marietta’s son in a cemetery.

Marietta’s attorney, Mark Rowan, disclosed the settlement Tuesday at a hearing scheduled for the North Union Township church’s appeal of a $5,071 fine imposed by a district judge.

Marietta said the details of the final resting place for his son are being worked out.

Ewing “Marcus” Marietta II is to be disinterred by Dec. 31.

After Marietta, 18, died from injuries related to a July 2009 crash, his father buried him on the church property, a five-acre residentially zoned lot on Oliver Road.

“We hope for God’s continued blessing on our church and our family as we move forward,” Marietta said outside the courtroom.

Judge Nancy Vernon rescheduled the hearing until Jan. 10 to ensure that both sides comply with the agreement.

A zoning officer last year cited the church for violating zoning regulations because cemeteries are permitted only in agricultural zones.

In March, the county’s Zoning Hearing Board unanimously denied the church’s subsequent application for a variance for a cemetery

According to the settlement, the church will withdraw its appeal of the zoning board’s decision and the county will not pursue any fines, court costs or other penalties related to the case.

“We do consent to the stipulated agreement as presented today,” zoning board Solicitor Gretchen Mundorff told Vernon.

Mundorff and Sheryl Heid, solicitor of the county Office of Planning, Zoning and Community Development, declined further comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.