ShareThis Page
Northampton woman, 44, gets jail for sex with teen boy |

Northampton woman, 44, gets jail for sex with teen boy

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:00 a.m

EASTON, Pa. (AP) — A 44-year-old woman who sobbed and said she felt “profound remorse” for having an affair with a 16-year-old boy was sentenced to 9 to 23 months in prison.

Northampton County Judge Paula A. Roscioli said Suzanne Wagner appeared “interested in having her legal troubles go away.” Though psychological profiles showed a low risk of reoffending, Roscioli said Wagner should be punished because the boy “was too young, too vulnerable, and you truly took advantage of him.”

Wagner had pleaded guilty to corruption of a minor. She was also fined $5,000, ordered to perform 100 hours of community service, and ordered to have no contact with the victim or other children except her own, who are ages 16 and 11.

Wagner began a relationship with the boy in 2002 when she was living in Northampton. Assistant District Attorney Patricia C. Broscius said the affair came to light when Wagner wrote a love letter to the boy after the relationship ended. The boy said he was a willing participant, and a 16-year-old can consent to sex under Pennsylvania law. Broscius has said Wagner was charged with corruption in large part because of the significant age difference between the two.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.