ShareThis Page
Not all veterans take day off |

Not all veterans take day off

| Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:00 a.m

Steelers coach Bill Cowher gave selected veterans the afternoon off Wednesday, but it looked like someone forgot to tell cornerback Chad Scott.

On one of the warmest days of training camp, Scott continued working after practice, running up and down the steep hill adjacent to the practice field five times and, then, hopping the fence from a standing start when he finished.

“I’m just trying to do my job, Scott said. “I don’t have nothing to do with (days off).”

Among others working on Veterans Day Off were linebacker James Farrior, nose tackle Casey Hampton, guard Alan Faneca and defensive end Aaron Smith.

“I’m just a foot soldier,” Smith said. “When they tell me to go to work, I go to work.”

It actually wasn’t a day off because everyone worked in the morning session.

Those sitting out later were center Jeff Hartings, safety Mike Logan, tight end Jay Riemersma, wide receiver Hines Ward, running backs Jerome Bettis and Duce Staley, defensive end Kimo von Oelhoffen and outside linebacker Joey Porter.

Asked how the rested veterans were chosen, Ward said, “I have no idea, but I was glad I was one of them, trust me.”

At one point, Cowher might have wished he had extended the courtesy to guard Kendall Simmons, who suffered a mild right knee sprain early in practice.

“To see one of the key guys go down, a lot of guys were really scared about that, Ward said.

Cowher said he was informed by trainer John Norwig that Simmons might be able to return to practice today.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.