Not missing out this time |

Not missing out this time

President Obama is going to make me rich.

That’s because the Obama administration, which has done everything in the government’s power to hamper economic growth, just loosened lending standards so that people with poor credit can buy homes.

Why not? It worked out well for some people the last time the government loosened lending standards.

“The Obama administration and federal regulators are reversing course on some of the biggest post-crisis efforts to tighten mortgage-lending standards amid concern they could snuff out the fledgling housing rebound and dent the economic recovery,” reports The Wall Street Journal.

Dent the economic recovery? Thanks to ObamaCare and Obama’s massive expansion of government regulations, the economic recovery looks more like a train wreck.

Well, Obama must be thinking that desperate times call for desperate actions, so let’s start the housing madness all over again.

I failed to benefit from it last time — and what a grand time it was — but I am not going to miss my chance this time.

See, back in 2002 or so, just as the housing bubble was forming, I was about to buy a townhouse for $165,000. I had the money. The owner was eager to sell. But my Midwestern cautiousness gave me cold feet and I backed out of the deal.

If only I had known that government stupidity was about to cause the value of the joint to soar over the next five years.

See, following 9/11, then-Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan lowered interest rates to stimulate the economy.

People were suddenly able to afford houses they couldn’t afford before. Home sales began to shoot up. As demand for housing rose, so did housing values.

As housing values climbed, homeowners saw their equity climb. Others decided owning a home was the way to easy wealth, so they began to buy, too.

Soon, a frenzy was under way. Bidding wars were breaking out. It was common for sellers to receive multiple offers well beyond their asking price.

It appeared to many people — even rational, well-educated people — that the rapid rise in values would never end. That caused speculators to jump into the market, which drove up values even more. It was about then that unqualified buyers jumped into the fray.

Roughly 25 percent of Americans have a bad credit record or unstable employment history. But this didn’t stop loan originators from going after them, too. Mortgage brokers and banks get commissions and fees every time they originate a loan — even a risky loan — and loose lending standards allowed them to write loans for virtually any old fool, not just people with bad credit.

Lost your job? No problem, we’ll finance your loan. Want to buy a dozen condos as rentals? Sign here and we’ll get you the cash.

After all, the lenders were thinking, we can sell the loans to someone else, who will sell them, through mortgage-backed securities, to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, quasi-governmental organizations that the government will have to bail out in the event of a housing-market collapse.

Finance companies created special mortgages — “subprime” loans — for people who didn’t qualify for the safer “prime” loans. Because subprime loans came with greater risks, higher interest rates were charged — usually 2 or 3 percentage points higher. That made these loans extremely profitable — until the people who got them stopped paying them back and the entire economy, propped up on funny money, went into freefall.

Well, the insanity of that time — made possible by loose lending standards — caused the townhouse I didn’t buy for $165,000 to soar to $525,000 in 2007 — before falling to about half that value following the collapse.

I won’t miss out on a deal like that again. This time, I’ll ride the boom to its peak and sell just before the inevitable market correction!

And that’s how Obama is going to make me rich.

Tom Purcell, a freelance writer, lives in Library. Visit him on the web at E-mail him at: [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.