Not Obama’s doing |

Not Obama’s doing

To confused Canadian Richard Brunt, writer of the letter “Welcome up north” : After nearlysix years in office, President Obama manages an economy stuck with a 5.8-percent unemployment rate (8.5 percent of the labor force when counting all unemployed plus those working part-time for economic reasons and those not seeking but available for jobs) and a GDP growth rate slightly greater than 2 percent.

In early 1964, Congress passed the tax cuts that John F. Kennedy had urged.

By early 1966, this country was growing at a rate of 6.6 percent, unemployment dropped to 3.8 percent and the Dow Jones Industrial Average nearly doubled.

In 1981, President Reagan signed into law one of the largest tax cuts in history.

During the next eight years, 20 million new jobs were created, the unemployment rate dropped and GDP growth averaged 5 percent per year.

America is now the largest producer of natural gas and well on its way to being oil-independent by 2015, primarily because of fracking, which Obama disdains due to his stubborn loyalty to the environmental groups who falsely claim that carbon dioxide endangers the environment.

The American economy has very slowly improved, but in spite of Obama.

Frank Losos


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.