ShareThis Page
‘Note By Note: The Making of Steinway L1037’ |

‘Note By Note: The Making of Steinway L1037’

A documentary about the painstaking, yearlong process of constructing a Steinway piano doesn’t sound terribly exciting.

But give this one a chance. “Note By Note” is full of surprising, if subtle, thrills.

The Steinway piano — made in the same factory in Queens to virtually the same specifications for more than a hundred years — is virtually without equal in its reputation for handcrafted detail, although Bosendorfer partisans may disagree. They’re made in a factory, but with very little machine tooling. As many as 450 craftsmen work on each piano, which contains more than 12,000 parts.

Ben Niles’ documentary takes us on the journey of one piano — from the lumberyard in Sitka, Alaska, all the way to the stage at New York’s Carnegie Hall. We meet all kinds of characters along the way, from the charmingly extroverted classical pianist Lang Lang, reminiscing about his introduction to the piano, through the music of “Tom & Jerry” cartoons, to a gruff woodworker in a Jack Lambert jersey, beaming with pride at the instrument he helped make but could never afford.

Each Steinway is a little different. Picking one out is more a job of matching compatible personalities than purchasing a product. Jazz musicans Harry Connick Jr., Bill Charlap, Hank Jones, Kenny Barron and Marcus Roberts, and classical players such as Pierre-Laurent Aimard and Helene Grimaud discuss and demonstrate their preferences — and, of course, add lots of beautiful music.

&#149 At Harris Theater, Downtown Additional Information:

‘Note By Note: The Making of Steinway L1037’

Not rated, but G in nature Three stars

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.