ShareThis Page
Notebook: Bears place Brown on IR |

Notebook: Bears place Brown on IR

The Associated Press
| Wednesday, September 22, 2004 12:00 a.m

The Chicago Bears placed Mike Brown on injured reserve Tuesday, one day after announcing the safety would miss the rest of the season with a torn Achilles’ tendon. The team elevated rookie cornerback Alfonso Marshall to fill Brown’s roster spot, and signed offensive lineman Bryan Anderson , a former Pitt player, to the practice squad.

  • Jets linebacker Sam Cowart has a sprained medial collateral ligament in his left knee and could miss 4 to 6 weeks.

  • Denver Broncos defensive end Trevor Pryce will have surgery today to remove a disc fragment from his lower back and is expected to miss 4 to 6 weeks.

  • Minnesota Vikings right tackle Mike Rosenthal is likely out for the season with an injury to his right foot. Rosenthal, who just signed a contract extension, was hurt in Monday night’s game at Philadelphia, as was tight end Jermaine Wiggins , who will miss 2 to 3 weeks with a broken left hand.

  • A few lines in Kellen Winslow Jr.’s contract with the Cleveland Browns could be as costly as the broken leg doctors found on his X-rays. The rookie tight end, who underwent surgery for his right leg yesterday, could miss out on a $5.3 million roster bonus because he got hurt, reported. Under terms of the six-year, $40 million performance-laden contract he signed in August, Winslow must participate in 35 percent of Cleveland’s offensive plays to receive the one-time bonus, paid in 2005. It’s unclear whether there is a medical provision to protect Winslow in case of injury.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.