ShareThis Page
Notebook: Bell still absent from practice |

Notebook: Bell still absent from practice

| Friday, September 24, 2004 12:00 a.m

Steelers inside linebacker Kendrell Bell (groin), cornerback Chad Scott (groin) and backup safety Mike Logan (hamstring) missed practice Thursday. Backup running back Verron Haynes (hip pointer) returned. Bell hasn’t played since the first preseason game Aug. 14.

  • With Ben Roethlisberger ready to make his first career start on Sunday, Steelers right guard Keydrick Vincent started reminiscing about the first time he played more than a few snaps in an NFL game. It was in Tennessee in 2001 when right tackle Marvel Smith was injured and Oliver Ross had to move from right guard to replace him. Vincent, an undrafted rookie at the time, replaced Ross. “I had no technique,” Vincent said. “I was just fighting for my life. I just wanted to fight everybody. I was missing blocks, but I was going to kick the (stuffing) out of whoever was in front of me.”

  • Marvel Smith has spent the better part of this week watching video of defensive end Jason Taylor , who is the most prolific sack artist in Dolphins history (72 sacks). “Whenever, you feel like you have him blocked, he’ll go to another move and that’s when I see a lot of (blockers) getting beat,” Smith said. “They just get lazy with their technique and he’ll out-quick them.” Smith never has played against Taylor, and is looking forward to the challenge. “You always have to look forward to playing against their best players, so I can’t wait for the game,” he said.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.