ShareThis Page
Notebook: Bettis taking caution |

Notebook: Bettis taking caution

| Sunday, July 22, 2001 12:00 a.m

Steelers running back Jerome Bettis limped off the practice field with his right hamstring and left knee wrapped Saturday afternoon, but he smiled and said that he was just being cautious.

‘He (trainer John Norwig) just wanted to pull me out, as opposed to doing too much and then trouble comes and you don’t see me out here and you say, ‘What’s going on?’

‘We’re just trying to prevent a big story.’

Bettis, who had minor knee surgery in the off-season, said the hamstring was sore from the 14 40-yard sprints he ran Friday.

Coach Bill Cowher acknowledged, however, that fullback Dan Kreider will miss ‘a couple of weeks’ with a strained calf muscle.

No one was hurt during the morning or afternoon session of the team’s first day of practice, but Kreider, linebacker Mike Sands (ankle), fullback Rod Frazier (hamstring) and center Chukky Okobi (hamstring) continued to rest their injuries.


Tight end Mark Bruener wore a brace while practicing on his previously injured right knee, but showed no ill effects from the injury. … Wide receiver Troy Edwards worked with the first team at split end while Hines Ward was at flanker. … Brent Alexander remains the starter at free safety, ahead of newcomer Mike Logan. … Pitt quarterback David Priestley, who is working as an intern for the WTAE-TV sports department, visited practice in the morning. … The Steelers have one practice today at 4 p.m.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.