ShareThis Page
Notebook: Bucs’ catcher Kendall happy to be back |

Notebook: Bucs’ catcher Kendall happy to be back

| Saturday, September 8, 2007 12:00 a.m

&#149 Former Pirates catcher Jason Kendall was diplomatic about making his first visit to PNC Park in a visiting uniform. “It’s good to be back,” said Kendall, who was not in the lineup Friday night for the Chicago Cubs. “I had a lot of good years here.” The franchise leader in games caught, Kendall was traded to the Oakland A’s after the 2004 season, then was dealt to the Cubs in July. Asked if he could play in the postseason for the second year in a row, Kendall said, “I think we’ve got a good shot. The hard part, though, is getting there.”

&#149 Manager Jim Tracy said he is “not overly optimistic” left-hander Paul Maholm (sore lower back) will be able to make his scheduled start Tuesday against the Milwaukee Brewers. Maholm has not thrown off a mound since Aug. 28.

&#149 If Maholm cannot go, the candidates to replace him are Shane Youman (3-5, 6.67 ERA), Bryan Bullington (0-1, 15.00) and John Van Benschoten (0-5, 10.86). Zach Duke will be activated this weekend, but will pitch out of the bullpen for a while.

&#149 Xavier Nady was a late scratch from the starting lineup yesterday. Nady would have started for the first time since Monday, when he was beaned in the head.


79 – Wins by Jason Schmidt since being sent to San Francisco in Dave Littlefield’s first trade.

10 – Wins in four-plus years by Ryan Vogelsong, whom the Pirates acquired in the deal for Schmidt.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.