ShareThis Page
Notebook: Devil Rays ink Nomo |

Notebook: Devil Rays ink Nomo

The Associated Press
| Friday, January 28, 2005 12:00 a.m

In the market for an experienced starting pitcher, the Tampa Bay Devil Rays turned to Hideo Nomo. The former NL Rookie of the Year agreed to a minor-league contract Thursday after spending more than two months on the disabled list and going 3-11 in 18 starts for Los Angeles in 2004. He was Los Angeles’ opening-day starter last season, but struggled with injuries.

  • Milwaukee Brewers outfielder Brady Clark agreed to a $1.15 million, one-year contract and avoided salary arbitration. Clark hit .280 with seven homers and 46 RBI in 138 games with Milwaukee last season. He made $376,000 last year and was eligible for arbitration for the first time, asking for $1.3 million.

  • Former Pirates pitcher Denny Neagle pleaded innocent to a solicitation charge stemming from allegations that he offered a woman $40 for sex. Neagle’s lawyer, Harvey Steinberg, filed the plea Tuesday in Jefferson County District Court. Police outside Denver issued the solicitation citation on Dec. 3, and the Colorado Rockies terminated Neagle’s contract three days later, citing the provision in the uniform player contract that states the team can end the deal if the player shall “fail, refuse or neglect to conform his personal conduct to the standards of good citizenship and good sportsmanship.”


    118 Major-league wins for pitcher Hideo Nomo, who has signed with the Tampa Bay Devil Rays

    101 Career losses for Nomo in 301 games, and 299 starts

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.