ShareThis Page
Notebook: Harris happy with Campbell’s unselfish play |

Notebook: Harris happy with Campbell’s unselfish play

| Friday, October 15, 2004 12:00 a.m

Pitt fullback Kellen Campbell was so thrilled to be starting against Temple that the junior walk-on from West Allegheny passed on a chance to score a touchdown. When Pitt called for a fullback blast at the Temple 1, Campbell deferred to Raymond Kirkley, who scored the go-ahead touchdown in the Panthers’ 27-22 victory. “It was supposed to be me,” Campbell said. “We had been shuffling all week. When Tyler (Palko) called the play, we didn’t know who was supposed to do it, so I said to Ray, ‘Go ahead.’ ” The 6-foot, 235-pound Campbell prefers to look on the bright side. He picked up the block on defensive tackle Eric Carpenter to spring Kirkley into the end zone. “Kellen played very well,” Pitt coach Walt Harris said, “extremely well on the goal line.”

  • Boston College coach Tom O’Brien’s tailback carousel featured a new member when the Eagles last played two weeks ago. A.J. Brooks set a freshman rushing record in a 29-7 victory over Division I-AA Massachusetts at Alumni Stadium. Brooks ran 23 times for 160 yards and became the third BC freshman tailback to break 100 this season. Andre Callender (114 vs. Penn State) and L.V. Whitworth (129 vs. Ball State) all could be available Saturday when the Eagles (4-1, 1-0) play Pitt (3-2, 1-1).

  • BC offensive line coach Don Horton explained why his school is known as O-lineman U. “We identify kids who are athletic,” he said. “Then we get them here and try to build them up. We want kids with good feet. We watch them play basketball and run track. We encourage them to play other sports, because it’s good for them. Some guys say they’re going to quit basketball to get bigger, but we want them to keep playing and hold onto their athleticism.”

    is a former freelancer.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.