ShareThis Page
Notebook: Refs in his corner? Lemieux doesn’t think so |

Notebook: Refs in his corner? Lemieux doesn’t think so

BUFFALO, N.Y. – Penguins’ opponents consistently have complained that referees give Mario Lemieux preferential treatment.

Lemieux strongly disagrees.

‘If there’s a borderline call, we don’t get the call because of my situation with the owners (that he is one of them),’ Lemieux said. ‘So, I think it’s been the opposite. In the Washington series, if you look at the tapes and you look at every game, it’s very clear that if there’s a borderline call, it goes against us.’

Lemieux’s linemate, Jaromir Jagr, expressed disbelief when told that some people think he and Lemieux get too many breaks.

‘Me also?’ Jagr said. ‘What are you talking about• That’s what they’re saying• They didn’t watch the games, probably. That’s the way they feel, I can’t do anything about it. I play the game.’

Jagr said it’s tough for anybody to draw penalties in the playoffs.

‘The referees let almost everything go, and if you have a power play, of course you’re happy about it,’ he said.


Buffalo Sabres forward Steve Heinze hopes his team’s depth will show over the course of the series.

‘If we can get some hits in and play a style they’re not used to, maybe we can tire them out,’ Heinze said. ‘Time will tell.’

Sabres coach Lindy Ruff likes to roll four lines. Penguins coach Ivan Hlinka, who normally uses three, got his fourth line of Rene Corbet, Josef Beranek and Ian Moran in the mix early last night.

‘We’re going to have to make up a fourth line and have them play at least 6, 7, 8 minutes a game and give us a chance to have some juice at the end,’ Lemieux said.

Jagr said the Penguins can match the Sabres in depth.

‘We have four good lines who can play defense and four good lines who can play offense,’ he said. ‘Most of the time, we play only three lines, but we can put the fourth line on the ice anytime, and they’re very dangerous. Anytime they’ve played, if they had one shift or two, they had some scoring chances.’


Jagr came into last night’s game with an NHL-best 14 career goals against Dominik Hasek.

‘I was just lucky,’ Jagr said. ‘God was on my side.’

Asked if he enjoys playing against Hasek, his former Olympic teammate, Jagr said, ‘You don’t have a choice. You have to play against him if you want to go to another round.’


There were empty seats at HSBC Arena last night. The biggest reason for that was ticket prices, some of which were bumped up 86 and 89 percent from regular-season prices. … Lemieux smiled when he was asked if he travels with the team. ‘No,’ he joked. ‘I have a big suite, and I charter back and forth.’ … In contrast to the Washington Capitals, who tried to keep Penguins fans away from the MCI Center, the Sabres flashed a message on the scoreboard welcoming Penguins fans and management.


  • ‘Michael Peca is a great player. He won the Selke many times. The way he played defense, I would say he was the best in the league playing that kind of style.’ – Jagr, on center Michael Peca, who sat out the entire season in a contract dispute

  • ‘I think you could ask the Flyers what a pain Curtis was. He’s great at reading lanes, putting his body in the right place.’ – Sabres coach Lindy Ruff, on center Curtis Brown.


    The Penguins scratched goaltender Jean-Sebastien Aubin, LW Dan LaCouture, LW Steve McKenna, D Frantisek Kucera and LW Krzysztof Oliwa. … The Sabres scratched C Eric Rasmussen (shoulder), C Chris Taylor, LW Eric Boulton, RW Rob Ray and D Richard Smehlik (foot).

  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.