ShareThis Page
Notebook: Snell may make ML debut against Phils |

Notebook: Snell may make ML debut against Phils

| Friday, September 24, 2004 12:00 a.m

Manager Lloyd McClendon said he is “leaning toward” giving rookie Ian Snell his first major-league start Tuesday in Philadelphia. “That would mean a great deal to me,” said Snell, who grew up in Delaware. “I feel real excited to hear that and hopefully it comes true.” Snell helped his cause by holding the Chicago Cubs to one run in five innings of relief Thursday. He threw 41 of his 58 pitches for strikes. “He had some composure and kept the ball down,” Cubs manager Dusty Baker said. “They’ve got some good young arms over there.”

  • In Snell’s major-league debut Aug. 20 in St. Louis, the first three hitters he faced were Albert Pujols, Scott Rolen and Jim Edmonds. This time, Snell faced Aramis Ramirez, Moises Alou and Sammy Sosa right out of the gate. He retired them on a fly ball and two pop-ups.

  • The Pirates were awaiting a medical evaluation yesterday from Dr. James Andrews concerning Kip Wells’ right elbow. Wells recently had a third MRI taken on his injured elbow and forwarded results from all three of his tests to Andrews’ office in Birmingham, Ala. General manager Dave Littlefield hopes to have Andrews’ evaluation today.

  • Batting seventh for just the second time this season, Craig Wilson hit his 28th homer, a two-run shot. He also struck out twice, increasing his season total to 160. Wilson is three away from tying Donn Clendenon’s franchise single-season record, which was set in 1968.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.