ShareThis Page
Notebook: Steelers break even in free agency |

Notebook: Steelers break even in free agency

| Sunday, July 28, 2002 12:00 a.m

The NFL’s free-agency signing period ended with 130 unrestricted players joining new teams. That represents 8 percent of the players in the league and the second-highest number since free agency began in 1993.

The Steelers lost four free agents: Linebacker Earl Holmes (Cleveland Browns), cornerback Jason Simmons (Houston Texans), wide receiver Bobby Shaw (Jacksonville Jaguars) and kicker Kris Brown (Texans). Brown was the only restricted free agent from the league-wide pool of 104 to join another team.

The Steelers also signed four free agents from other teams: Linebacker James Farrior (New York Jets), kicker Todd Peterson (Kansas City Chiefs), quarterback Charlie Batch (Detroit Lions) and wide receiver Terance Mathis (Atlanta Falcons).

Of the Steelers’ seven unrestricted free agents who jumped into the pool in March, linebackers Jason Gildon and John Fiala and cornerback Deshea Townsend re-signed, and safety Myron Bell failed to find a job, with the Steelers or anyone else.

Of greater importance were the four restricted free agents who signed multi-year extensions: linebacker Joey Porter, defensive end Aaron Smith, running back Amos Zereoue and offensive lineman Oliver Ross. The unrestricted free agents next year will include offensive tackle Wayne Gandy, strong safety Lee Flowers, quarterback Charlie Batch, wide receiver Terance Mathis, long snapper Mike Schneck and tight ends Matt Cushing and Jerame Tuman.

Schneck, Cushing and Tuman, however, are in battles for roster spots this year.


The Campbell’s Soup company will weigh Steelers guard Keydrick Vincent and a teammate Tuesday at training camp and donate 10 times their combined weight in soup cans to the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.