ShareThis Page
Oakmont pro shoots club record 62 |

Oakmont pro shoots club record 62

| Friday, August 11, 2006 12:00 a.m

A couple of weeks ago, putting up a round of 62 was the furthest thing from Bob Ford’s mind.

He was having enough trouble standing up straight because of a bad back that flared up just before the Sewickley Heights Invitational. He shot his worst round in decades and has been on the mend since.

In the final round of the 2006 Tri-State Senior PGA Professional Championship Qualifier/TSPGA Senior Section Championship on Wednesday at Quicksilver Golf Club in Midway, Ford had one of those magical days.

He made 10 birdies, no bogeys and established the competitive course record of 62.

“I haven’t even shot a 65 or 66 for as long as I can remember,” the Oakmont Country Club pro said. “I had 12 one-putt greens today, and the longest putt was about 20 feet.”

With the win, Ford qualifies for the PGA Senior National Championship to be played Oct. 19-22 at the PGA Golf Club in Port St. Lucie, Fla.

“The greens were real soft, and the golf course played short (it was set up to 6,533 yards),” Ford said. “I knew I was 9-under (par) standing in the middle of the 18th fairway, and I never play well.

“I knew 9-under tied what Roy (Vucinich) shot yesterday, so I told myself to get up there like a man and shoot a 62.”

And when his 12-foot birdie putt fell in the cup, he had.

Other local club pros to qualify are: Vucinich, John Aubrey, John Mazza, Phil Newcamp, John Rech, Bob Meyer and Kenny Frye.

Additional Information:

Complete coverage

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.