ShareThis Page
Oakmont teen dies after being struck by train in Plum |

Oakmont teen dies after being struck by train in Plum

| Saturday, October 15, 2016 6:13 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
A police officer leans against his patrol car at the scene of an accident where a pedestrian was struck by a train near Hulton Road in Plum, Saturday, Oct. 15, 2016.

An Oakmont teenager who was walking on railroad tracks in Plum died after she was struck by a train Saturday afternoon.

Allegheny County Police Supt. James Morton said Ciara Hasselman, 17, was walking on the train tracks that run alongside the Pennsylvania Turnpike and below the Oakmont Country Club’s twin pedestrian bridges.

“Despite numerous signals from the train, the female did not move from the tracks and was hit,” Morton said in an email.

The Allegheny County medical examiner’s office said she died at 5:58 p.m. at Forbes Regional Hospital.

Allegheny County Police Homicide Unit is investigating.

Paramedics reported the patient had head trauma and fractures to the lower limbs, according to Allegheny County 911 emergency dispatches.

Rescuers called in a medical helicopter that landed at the former Oakmont East Golf Course, but the patient never was loaded onto the helicopter.

Instead, the ambulance, which had been parked beside the helicopter, drove away from the landing zone about 4:15 p.m. with the patient still inside.

Patrick Waldron, a spokesman for Canadian National Railway, said CN owns and was operating the southbound train, which consisted of only of two cars, when it struck Hasselman at about 3 p.m. The train was halted while police investigated; Waldron said no other traffic was affected.

Plum police said they could not comment.

Liz Hayes is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Hayes can be reached at reached at Staff writer Matthew Santoni contributed to this report.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.