ShareThis Page
Offensive breakdown |

Offensive breakdown

| Sunday, September 1, 2002 12:00 a.m

  • The offense will succeed if: Quarterback Kordell Stewart is able to make the right reads and deliver accurate passes on a consistent basis. There’s no reason to believe he won’t do so. He has more weapons surrounding him this season, which means the Steelers won’t have to rely on his running ability for big plays. Stewart’s running will still be an integral part of the offense, but for a change, he ought to be able to count on the likes of wide receivers Plaxico Burress and Antwaan Randle El making big plays on a regular basis, as well as Hines Ward moving the sticks and energizing the running game.

  • The offense will fail if: The Steelers’ newfound affinity for the passing game causes a drop off in their ability to shove the ball down defense’s throats and control games on the ground. Not being able to run when there are eight or nine defenders near the line of scrimmage and the passing game is there for the taking is one thing. Not being able to run because the line lacks the cohesion and consistency it once had and running back Jerome Bettis not making it all the way back from injuries is another.

  • Player on the spot: Bettis. He’s on his way to the Hall of Fame someday, but before he gets there, the Steelers are going to need a lot more from him than they’ve seen this preseason. Bettis and everyone say everything’s fine and that the old “Bus” will be up and rumbling soon enough. Anything less will make the Steelers too one dimensional and put too much pressure on a passing game that’s still evolving.

  • Star on the rise: Randle El. His selection caused more of an anticipatory stir than any Steelers draft pick since Rod Woodson (No. 1 in 1987), and already, Randle El has exceeded expectations. Get him on the field, get him the ball and get out of the way.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.