Officers hurt in scuffle with suspect |

Officers hurt in scuffle with suspect

Two South Park Township police officers were injured Friday after scuffling with a man accused of trying to steal cigarette papers from Schoeb’s Sunoco at 5660 Brownsville Road.

Sgt. David Starzynski was about 50 yards away from the store when a clerk called police around 1:23 a.m., said Deputy Chief Dennis McDonough.

McDonough said the suspect, Branden Stromberg, 24, whose last known address is in the 6200 block of Library Road, Bethel Park, had scuffled with the unidentified clerk while allegedly trying to steal cigarette papers from behind the counter. The clerk was uninjured.

McDonough said Stromberg confronted Starzynski with a large metal chain as he walked out of the store. Stromberg broke away and was trying to steal Starzynski’s car when the second officer, Gerard Fox, arrived.

The two officers subdued Stromberg, who McDonough said police believe was high on marijuana and other narcotics. The department is awaiting the results of toxicology reports.

Both officers complained of back and shoulder injuries and were treated and released from Jefferson Hospital. Stromberg was treated at the hospital and then sent to the Allegheny County Jail. He was released on bond later the same day, McDonough said.

Stromberg is charged with two counts of assault on a police officer and one count each of robbery, attempted auto theft and resisting arrest.

A preliminary hearing has been postponed until the officers return to duty, McDonough said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.