ShareThis Page
Officials confirm death of Pa. soldier |

Officials confirm death of Pa. soldier

The Associated Press
| Saturday, April 5, 2003 12:00 a.m

HARBORCREEK — The human toll of the war in Iraq came home to this modest bedroom community near Erie on Friday as residents learned that one of their own had perished, a young man who had told his father he would never take life for granted again if he returned.

Spc. Donald Samuel Oaks Jr., 20, was killed in Iraq when a bomb dropped on a multilaunch rocket system, according to his father and grandfather, who say they heard from Army officials on Thursday.

The Department of Defense confirmed yesterday that Oaks and two other soldiers from the same unit were killed in action Thursday but did not say how they died, only that “an investigation is ongoing.” Also killed were Sgt. 1st Class Randall S. Rehn, 36, of Longmont, Colo., and Sgt. Todd J. Robbins, 33, of Pentwater, Mich.

Oaks’ grandfather, Samuel Oaks, had said an F-15 was dropping ordnance in the area when his grandson was killed.

At the home of Oaks’ grandparents, friends and family gathered yesterday, many of them bringing food and talking gently as CNN played on a television in the background. Some people cried quietly in the somber split-level home, in which photos of the fallen soldier were displayed on an easel in the living room.

Oaks’ father, Donald Sr., remembered the last time he talked to his son, on a call from Kuwait in January. “He said, ‘Dad, I’ll never take anything for granted again. People don’t know what they have in the United States. All I want to do is come home, take a shower, be with my family and go fishing.”

Oaks was assigned to C Battery, 3rd Battalion, 13th Field Artillery Regiment (Multiple Launch Rocket System), and stationed in Fort Sill, Okla.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.