ShareThis Page
Officials review site plans for development |

Officials review site plans for development

Elizabeth Barczak
| Sunday, June 17, 2001 12:00 a.m

Shaler Township officials are debating plans for 52 new homes on a 19-acre site near Shaler Area High School.

The township planning commission is reviewing site plans for a development along Wible Run Road, across from St. Joseph Drive.

Shaler commissioners could vote on the project as early as next month.

The planning commission granted preliminary approval for the site development plan last month.

Plans call for a mix of single- and two-story homes with lot sizes around 9,000 square feet.

Under the plan, two new streets would feed onto Wible Run Road. Property owner Mark Brantner needs approval from Allegheny County before proceeding because Wible Run is a county-maintained road.

Township officials told Brantner that the new road should be aligned with St. Joseph Drive.

‘We asked them to correct that so that traffic would be facing one another,’ Commissioner Tom Montgomery said.

Storm water and erosion plans also are required before construction may begin.

Brantner also needs a sanitary sewer easement from the Shaler Area School District before the project may proceed.

Brantner told commission members that he plans to tear down the three homes and a barn that are on the property. The timetable calls for the new roads to be paved by November.

Elizabeth Barczak can be reached at or (724) 779-7113.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.