ShareThis Page
Officials split court duties |

Officials split court duties

| Thursday, April 4, 2002 12:00 p.m

Allegheny County court officials scrambled Wednesday to parcel out work formerly done by Senior Judge Robert E. Dauer and Orphans’ Court Administrative Judge Paul Zavarella, each of whom died within the past week.

Dauer, 73, died in his sleep Tuesday. Zavarella, 69, who suffered from cancer, passed away on Saturday.

Common Pleas Judge Gerard Bigley, administrative judge of the Criminal Division, said Dauer’s duties temporarily will be split among the other judges.

“I’ve had several judges come to me and say whatever is needed, they’ll do,” Bigley said yesterday after meeting with court personnel.

Dauer, who had been a senior judge since finishing a five-year term as president judge in 1998, handled his own criminal calendar, in addition to conducting hearings in alternative programs for nonviolent offenders.

Bigley said he’ll meet with state Supreme Court Chief Justice Stephen A. Zappala Sr., to see if the local court can get another commissioned senior judge and a full-time judge assigned to the division. He said the division is short one judge from its full 12-judge bench.

Dauer also heard cases arising from decisions by district justices and Pittsburgh magistrates in the Summary Appeals section, which comes under the supervision of President Judge Robert A. Kelly.

Court Administrator Raymond Billotte said Kelly was on vacation and no action has been taken to replace Dauer in Summary Appeals.

Billotte said he knows of no timetable for the state Supreme Court to name a new administrative judge of the Orphans’ Court Division to replace Zavarella.

Kelly will assign a judge to handle Zavarella’s duties in the division.

Gov. Schweiker will also name a new judge to fill the vacancy left by Zavarella. The appointee would serve until a new judge selected in the November 2003 general election takes office.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.