ShareThis Page
Officials: Woman went ‘doctor shopping’ for drugs |

Officials: Woman went ‘doctor shopping’ for drugs

| Monday, December 26, 2016 11:15 p.m

A Washington Township woman is accused of visiting almost 30 doctors to get thousands of narcotic pills and $160,000 in medical care while she was waiting for sentencing for similar charges from 2013, according court reports.

Virginia Baustert, 41, of Hilltop Drive is now accused of theft by deception, insurance fraud and misrepresentation to get almost 3,000 pills and medical care.

In January 2015, Baustert pleaded guilty to insurance fraud to get drugs. Identity theft and two other charges were dismissed when she entered the plea in Westmoreland County court.

Records show she was still awaiting sentencing in November for a 2013 case when the latest charges were filed by agents of the state Attorney General’s office.

She is accused of making false insurance claims to Highmark insurance between June 2013 and last April to obtain about medical care and prescriptions that were allegedly “not medically necessary.”

According to the arrest report, Baustert visited about 15 doctors in their offices and others in emergency rooms to get prescriptions in Allegheny Township, Leechburg, Harrison, Armstrong County Memorial Hospital and other locations including Robinson Township, Scottdale, Indiana and Uniontown.

Attorney General’s investigators called it “doctor shopping.”

Agents said Baustert went to a York drug rehabilitation program in 2014 but she allegedly started again to abuse narcotics.

Baustert was charged in November along with 49 others. The 50, from across the state, were accused of $1.1 million in insurance fraud.

Baustert waived the latest charges to court this month.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4711 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.