ShareThis Page
O’hara voting districts to be reconfigured |

O’hara voting districts to be reconfigured

Tawnya Panizzi
| Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:00 a.m

About 280 O’Hara residents could be switched to a new voting district in the fall to help balance some recent and heavy development along the Allegheny River.

Council has applied to the Allegheny County Elections Division for reapportionment, which means some residents would vote at a new polling place in November.

“Basically, we wanted to even out all the districts,” Township Manager Julie Jakubec said.

Some residents who live in Ward 1, District 1 will be moved to Ward 5, District 2.

It is unclear which polling site they will be transferred to, Jakubec said.

Voters will be notified by county officials when the reapportionment is final.

She said the calculations are based on total population, not the number of registered voters.

“Ward 1 has become so heavy because of all the development along the waterfront,” Jakubec said.

Four residential developments — Continental Communities, Lighthouse Harbor, The Cove and Chapel Harbor at the Water — will add an estimated 2,000 people to the area.

At one point, there was a suggestion to council that the neighborhoods along the water could be its own new voting ward.

Each of the five districts represented by a council member is targeted to have about 800 people.

Based on the 2000 Census, Ward 1 had 1,100 people, whereas Ward 5 had only 515 people.

Tawnya Panizzi is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Tawnya at 412-782-2121 x1512, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.