ShareThis Page
Ohio lawmaker objects to Bible removal at military base |

Ohio lawmaker objects to Bible removal at military base

The Associated Press
| Thursday, April 14, 2016 6:27 p.m

DAYTON, Ohio — An Ohio congressman said it’s unacceptable that a Bible was removed from a POW display at a military base medical center.

U.S. Rep. Mike Turner sent a letter this week to the top general at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base objecting to the Bible’s removal from a POW/MIA table display in the hospital’s dining facility, The Dayton Daily News reported.

The Bible was removed last week when the Military Religious Freedom Foundation complained, base spokeswoman Marie Vanover said.

The foundation received more than 30 complaints, 10 of which came from people identifying as Christians, according to Mikey Weinstein, the organization’s founder and president.

Turner’s letter to Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski said he’s concerned that “similar efforts to restrict religious freedom” may be made at other military sites.

“It’s a very dangerous precedent to have a group that has an issue campaign to effect policy on a government installation merely by complaining,” the congressman said.

Weinstein said the foundation had constitutional concerns about the Bible’s display.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.