Archive

ShareThis Page
Ohio trooper advertised on Craigslist for ‘traffic stop sex,’ records released by highway patrol show | TribLIVE.com
News

Ohio trooper advertised on Craigslist for ‘traffic stop sex,’ records released by highway patrol show

The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio — A state trooper convicted of forcing female motorists into sexual acts in exchange for dropping traffic charges used Craigslist to offer “traffic stop sex,” according to records released Monday that highlight the women’s fear of reporting him.

Trooper Bryan Lee sent multiple Facebook messages to a female passenger he photographed without her shirt on, including one that let her know he’d been keeping an eye on her, a detail included in hundreds of pages of records the Ohio State Highway Patrol released in response to media requests.

The records include the dashboard camera recording that sparked the patrol’s investigation in October 2013. Lee resigned and was prosecuted.

In the video, Lee can be heard flirting with a female driver and the passenger he later photographed.

At one point, after the passenger told him the name of the bar where she’d been that night, he said he’d been there the week before and she wouldn’t have needed a ride home “if I would have saw you.”

Lee’s flirting was inappropriate for a traffic stop, patrol Lt. Craig Cvetan said. The video was discovered during a routine patrol check of dash-cam recordings.

Lee later sent the passenger multiple Facebook messages, including one in which he said he’d seen her at a fair and identified what she was wearing.

As the investigation continued, the patrol found two postings Lee made on Craigslist.

“I am in Law Enforcement so if the idea of traffic stop sex sounds good let me know,” one posting said.

Lee, 31, was sentenced to five years in federal prison in April for violating the women’s civil rights.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.