ShareThis Page
Oliver knocks off Peabody |

Oliver knocks off Peabody

| Saturday, January 25, 2003 12:00 a.m

Oliver anticipated that Peabody would use a zone defense to slow down its high-scoring attack, but the Bears were hoping to surprise the Highlanders by unveiling one of their own for the first time this season.

It was a shot in the dark, but it worked.

Oliver survived in a half-court offensive set, but Peabody shot itself out of the game, as the Bears beat the four-time defending City League champions, 52-48, Friday night at Peabody.

“Any time, on the road, when you beat a sound team, it’s a big win,” Oliver coach Carey White said. “I didn’t want to show (the zone) until the playoffs, but we used it and it worked.

“That’s another thing teams have to prepare for against us.”

White was the first to admit it wasn’t a pretty win, especially for a team that was averaging 70.1 points per game and had scored 80 or more six times this season. The 52 points were the second-lowest total of the season for Oliver (15-3, 11-2), which scored 50 in a season-opening loss at Bethel Park.

“When a team is going to sit back in a zone against us, I preach to be patient,” Oliver coach Carey White said. “That’s why the score’s that way. I’d rather be scoring in the 70s and 80s. We’re a better team that way.”

Oliver avenged a 59-58 loss to Peabody (11-7, 8-5) on Dec. 13, thanks in part to the Highlanders’ poor shooting. Peabody made 18 of 53 field goals, but was only 3 of 22 from 3-point range and 9 of 19 on free throws.

“We’ve got to play good defense – and we did – but turnover after turnover and our 3-point shooting killed us,” Peabody coach Jim Kahn said. “If you can’t put the ball in the hoop, you can’t win. If they won by four, they won by 10 or 12 at the foul line.”

David Robinson scored a game-high 16 points and Gilmore Cummings added 15 to lead Oliver, which also got seven points and eight rebounds off the bench from 6-foot-2 sophomore Maurice Page. Peabody was led by Justin Mullen’s 15 and Gavin Turner’s 14.

The game was tied at 44-44 before Cummings followed a runner with a twisting shot off the glass with 1:13 left for a four-point lead. Page added two free throws to extend it to 50-45 with 40.7 seconds left.

Peabody was 4 of 21 from the field and 8 of 18 from the foul line in the fourth quarter.

“Their shooters were off,” Cummings said. “That zone was the key to our success.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.