ShareThis Page
On the midnight train to Georgia |

On the midnight train to Georgia

Kate Guerriero
| Sunday, December 5, 2010 12:00 a.m

We’ll be the first to admit that our vocal talent does little more than inspire the neighborhood dogs to howl, so imagine how jealous we were during Tuesday’s Hillman Cancer Center gala at the Monroeville Convention Center , when we found one songbird who was more than willing to give Grammy-award winning Gladys Knight (who just happened to be our guest performer) a run for her money.

“Oh, I am going to take the stage from Gladys,” laughed Clyde Jones.

Celebrate! A Future Without Cancer toasted the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute’s 25th anniversary, where honorary chair Sy Holzer chatted with Mario Lemieux, La La Land transplant David Conrad prepped for his emceeing duties, and co-chairs Steve and Susan McGalla and David and Vanessa Morehouse weighed in on whether or not they would be requesting a duet with Ms. Knight.

“I’m going to pass, this time,” mused David.

Thirty minutes into our cocktail hour and a sudden mob scene alerted us to Henry and Elsie Hillman ‘s arrival, recently engaged Dr. Stanley Marks and fiancee Nikol Snee floated in and made the rounds, Athena Sarris did her best to get us to tempt us into skipping dinner with individual boxes of Sarris chocolates that awaited us at our seats, and Deb Wheeler nearly incited a riot when she informed us weary travelers (rain, rush hour and the Parkway East … i.e., instant migraine) of her breezy commute.

“I came from Somerset, so it was easy for me!” she exclaimed.

Over the past five years, $100 million has been raised towards cancer research at UPCI and UPMC cancer centers.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.