ShareThis Page
Once wiped out globally, smallpox still poses threat |

Once wiped out globally, smallpox still poses threat

In what is hailed as the greatest medical achievement of the 20th century, smallpox was eradicated worldwide in the 1970s, ending routine vaccinations.

Yet that monumental achievement — the first and so far only time human intervention wiped a disease from earth — makes people so vulnerable to a bioterrorism attack today.

Smallpox is a highly contagious and potentially fatal virus. The most common form kills one in three people and leaves many survivors scarred and some blind. A less common form, hemorrhagic smallpox, is nearly 100 percent lethal. Never having been vaccinated, most of the population have little or no immunity from the disease.

After its eradication in nature, the World Health Organization decided only two sites, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta and a government lab in Moscow, would keep smallpox samples for research. The rest were to be destroyed.

Other nations were left on what amounted to an honor system, said Jonathan Tucker, author of “Scourge: The Once and Future Threat of Smallpox.” It would be easy to hide a vial of smallpox, Tucker said.

U.S. government officials and experts believe numerous countries, including Iraq and North Korea, kept unauthorized stores to develop into biological weapons.

Russia’s government violated WHO regulations in 1994 by secretly moving its authorized samples to a former biological weapons site in Siberia.

Plans to destroy the authorized stores during the 1990s were delayed repeatedly, and, last May, WHO decided to delay destruction indefinitely.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.