ShareThis Page
One man’s trash is another’s clue |

One man’s trash is another’s clue

| Tuesday, November 8, 2005 12:00 a.m

Franklin Park officials went too far when they hired a private eye who dug through a borough worker’s garbage while investigating moonlighting claims, some residents say.

From May 17 to June 6, Franklin Park paid $867 to Monaca, Beaver County, private investigator Gentile-Meinert & Associates to determine whether building inspector Tim Phillips was doing outside work on the borough’s time, according to billing records obtained by the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

The investigation included sifting through the garbage at Phillips’ Shaler home and placing a global positioning device on the underside of a borough-owned sport utility vehicle he drives.

Neither borough Manager Ambrose Rocca nor council President Franklin Libson would say who ordered the investigation or what it found.

“The matter has been attended to,” Libson said. “We had a problem and we resolved it.”

Phillips, 47, referred questions to his lawyer, Bob Garber. Phillips remains on the job, which pays him $51,830 annually.

Phillips conducts home inspections outside Franklin Park on his own time and does “nothing that conflicts with his borough time,” Garber said.

Garber declined to comment further.

According to a Gentile-Meinert bill, investigators met with borough solicitor Ira Weiss, Rocca and police Chief Donald Dorsch in May to discuss the probe. Dorsch said he was not a part of the investigation.

“I didn’t even know about (the investigation),” said Councilman Dick Hartman, the borough’s former building inspector. “I found out through the grapevine. Nothing ever came before council on this. … It’s wrong what they did to him.”

Some residents agree.

“I thought this was highly improper. If this is about borough time, why are they digging through his family’s trash?,” said Kathleen Gallagher, 48. “(Phillips) is well respected. This isn’t the kind of borough I want to live in. Any council member who supports this, doesn’t deserve to be on council.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.