Open invitation |

Open invitation

Cheap, fraud-prone Mexican identification cards are tailor-made for illegals, experts say. Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge says banks and communities that accept them do so “at their peril.”

Nevertheless, the Treasury Department — with all the backbone of a wet noodle — will let stand rules that allow financial institutions to accept matricula consular cards. The agency passed the buck, saying it’s up to those institutions to access the “risk” of accepting the cards.

And exactly how are they supposed to do that• “Pardon me, sir, but before we open your new account with that suitcase of cash you’re carrying, can you tell us whether you or anyone in your family is a terrorist?”

One branch of the federal government has closed its eyes to problematic IDs flagged by other government branches.

Oh, there was a lot of public pressure to keep the cards: About 90 percent of 34,602 public comments received by the Treasury favored leaving the ID rules intact. But immigrants who are here legally have no need for the quickie IDs.

So who do you think pushed for their continued acceptance — apart from the America Last and Open Gate crowds•

And if a burnt matricula consular card turns up on the remains of suicide bomber on U.S. soil , they’ll say he was the exception.

Treasury’s decision is an open invitation to disaster.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.