Opportunity for budget reform |

Opportunity for budget reform

Although the United States faces two years of divided government, having a Democrat President and Republican Congress need not bring total gridlock.

This is an opportunity to pass reforms that will not take effect until 2017 or later, when either party may hold the White House or Congress and the partisan impact of such reforms is unclear.

One such bill would reform the budget process by requiring future presidents to submit a balanced budget to Congress. This could be phased in, allowing the president to show steadily shrinking deficits for perhaps the first five years and a balanced budget from that point forward.

A balanced budget proposal from the president would provide an important starting point for the debate over government spending. It would force the president and his Cabinet to determine priorities. Congress, in its budget debates, would have to explain why additional spending was so important that it would justify running a deficit.

The last time this nation had a Democrat president and a Republican Congress, they balanced the budget while also cutting taxes. Surely President Obama and the 114th Congress can agree on this modest legislation, a small first step toward a balanced budget.

Peter J. Thomas

Washington, D.C.

The writer is chairman of Americans for Constitutional Liberty/The Conservative Caucus. He served in the past three Republican presidential administrations.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.