Ordinary items trigger bomb scare at airport |

Ordinary items trigger bomb scare at airport

Security officials at Pittsburgh International Airport discovered a recipe for chaos Wednesday morning. Just put three snow globes, a stack of record albums and a cell phone charger in a suitcase. Then try to get it through a screening machine.

“Just by happenstance they lined up in a certain way that made the screening machine think it was an explosive device,” Allegheny County police Assistant Superintendent Paul Wolf said. “Once we looked at it with our equipment, we could tell it was safe.”

But authorities shut down the Findlay airport for 35 minutes and 120 people had to be evacuated from the Landside Terminal, delaying some flights as police examined the suitcase and interviewed the unwitting passenger who packed it.

The federal Transportation Security Administration notified the airport about 6:15 a.m. that an explosive-detection machine had “detected a suspicious explosive device” in a bag that had been checked on the ticketing level, airport spokeswoman JoAnn Jenny said.

Wolf said the enhanced X-ray image from the machine showed glass bulbs that looked like batteries, a wire — from the phone charger — and a dense stack of material — the records — that could have formed a bomb.

“It was a good decision to evacuate based on what the TSA saw and the threat assessment,” he said. “It just turned out to be common household items.”

Officials declined to identify the traveler who had checked the luggage. Wolf said he was interviewed and proceeded with his flight.

Jenny said the evacuation had a minimal effect on flight schedules, causing “slight delays” as airlines held a handful of planes for the evacuated travelers.

“The bulk of US Airways flights don’t depart until 8 or 8:15, so those passengers probably were just arriving when we got the ‘all-clear’ from police,” she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.