Organ transplant policy places no limit on number of foreign patients |

Organ transplant policy places no limit on number of foreign patients

Luis Fábregas

The National Transplant Act of 1984 specifies that only medical criteria, not citizenship, can determine who receives an organ.

“National organ allocation policies do not offer preference to patients who come from other countries,” said Martin Kramer, communications director for the Health Resources and Services Administration, which oversees organ procurement and transplants for the government.

Until 2012, any program performing more than 5 percent of its transplants on foreign patients was subject to an audit — although none was audited, according to the American Journal of Transplantation.

“There was never any action or any consequence for anyone going over 5 percent,” said Dr. Gabriel Danovitch, former chair of the international relations committee of the United Network for Organ Sharing.

The committee changed its rule to eliminate confusing terminology and determine whether international patients specifically came to the United States for transplants. UNOS approved the revised policy, with no limit on foreign patients, in June 2012.

“We're not Immigration people. Transplant centers aren't designed to examine passports and visas and green cards. … What we need to know is: Do you live here or not?” Danovitch said.

The changes in terminology make comparisons with earlier years impossible, according to UNOS.

The 2013 data show that most people from other countries seeking transplants in the United States are awaiting kidneys and livers. Among 58,693 new people on the wait list last year, 617 were nonresidents, or about 1.1 percent. Of those, 245 came here specifically for transplants.

“The impact on patients awaiting transplants in the United States is just being examined now,” said Dr. Francis Delmonico, a professor of surgery at Harvard University.

Luis Fábregas is Trib Total Media's medical editor. He can be reached at 412-320-7998 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.