ShareThis Page
OSU women expected to defense league title |

OSU women expected to defense league title

| Monday, October 30, 2006 12:00 a.m

Two-time defending conference champion Ohio State was unanimously picked to win the Big Ten title again in polling released by the league’s coaches Sunday.

And, to nobody’s surprise, Ohio State’s senior center Jessica Davenport was named the conference’s preseason player of the year and was an unanimous selection to the conference first team. She was the league’s player of the year in each of the past two seasons.

Ohio State went 29-3 season, including 15-1 in the Big Ten, and reached the second round of the NCAA Tournament. In preseason rankings, the Buckeyes were followed by Purdue and Michigan State.

Penn State, coming off a 13-16 season, with a 6-10 league mark, was ranked fourth by the coaches and also by a panel of 22 media members. Lady Lions senior forward/center Amanda Brown was named to the first team.

“We are extremely thrilled that Amanda has earned this honor,” Penn State coach Rene Portland said. “She is very excited about her senior year, and this is a great way to kick it off.”

Davenport is one of two players to finish in the top 10 in the Big Ten in scoring, rebounding, blocked shots and field-goal percentage. The other is Brown, who was sixth in points per game (15.6), fourth in rebounds per game (7.3), second in blocks per game (2.0) and second in field-goal percentage (.593).

Penn State is expected to rely heavily on junior co-captain Kam Gissendanner of Clairton, junior guard Adrienne Squire and sophomore point guard Brianne O’Rourke of Pittsburgh.

The Lady Lions open their non-conference season Nov. 10 at Drexel.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.