ShareThis Page
Our best days? |

Our best days?

| Sunday, August 1, 2004 12:00 a.m

Amid waving banners inside Boston’s FleetCenter, Sen. John Kerry assured enthused Democrats that “our best days are still to come” and vowed a litany of changes if he wins the White House in November. President Bush must be no less committed to change.

A change away from appeasement of special interests. A change in fiscal policy that has porked federal spending for almost four years and ballooned a record deficit. But most importantly, a change back to core principles that since January 2001 have fallen by the wayside.

The results: A Medicare prescription drug package that will bankrupt generations of Americans. A plan for illegal alien amnesty that secures legitimacy for the illegitimate while opening the door to our enemies. Intelligence that’s still not terribly intelligent. And a postwar Iraq strategy that affords little strategy but, instead, a plan-as-we-go approach.

School choice• Social Security reform• Tort reform• Less government• These and so many other promises for “best days” have fallen by the wayside. Instead, political capital is squandered on such nonstarters as the federal marriage amendment.

If, in fact, the Bush campaign kowtows to moderates and liberals, assuming that core supporters who came out four years ago will do so again, Nov. 2 will be a grim day of reckoning.

If instead, Bevy Bush embraces with conviction a meaningful change from its current ambivalent course, there will be brighter days, the best of days, for all Americans.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.